Legislation & Regulation
They cited concerns that the Trump administration would allow more logging, oil drilling, mining or development on some of the 46 million acres controlled by the federal government in California.
- DOI to address threatened species
- 141 Confirmations still pending
- California withdrawals canceled
Like all federal judges, he swore an oath to perform his duties “impartially… under the Constitution and laws of the U.S.” Nothing in those documents gives Judge Morris authority to order the BLM to work with non-government organizations (the same ones that filed the lawsuit in question) to alter America’s use of energy.
- Proposed budget for EPA
- California SB 1222
- 640 million acres and counting
- Gold and silver bullion
Besides the EPA issue, our major priority is to work on the proposed amendment to the National Strategic and Critical Minerals Production Act (S 145), a bill proposed in the Senate by US Senator Dean Heller (R-Nevada).
• Change is coming at Interior
• Interior Department seeking public comment regarding minerals
Minerals and Mining Advisory Council (MMAC) founder Joe Martori met with Jim Scrivner, the Bureau of Land Management Deputy State Director of Energy and Minerals in Sacramento, California...
• Critical minerals a priority
• Montana miners win again
• MSHA backs down
• Environmental groups as foreign agents
- EPA declines to impose additional regulations and financial requirements on hardrock miners
- “Baffling” ruling in suction gold dredging court case
- EPA ends "sue and settle"
- Sage grouse mineral withdrawal cancelled
The very way it was done at the time didn’t give one much confidence in the objectivity and honesty of the BLM study.
- PLF sues over critical habitat
- Attorney General ends EPA slush fund
I hope this case inspires some of you. It shows that miners can and do succeed when they are persistent and well-prepared, even when representing themselves against state and federal attorneys in a court of law.