Legislation & Regulation
Legislative and Regulatory Update
May 2016 by Scott Harn
• US District Court rules against Oregon miners
On March 25, 2016, Judge Mark Clarke ruled the State of Oregon can prohibit the use of motorized equipment for instream mining in the name of environmental protection. (Bohmker v. State of Oregon, US District Court, Medford, Oregon, 1:15-cv-01975-CL.)
Judge Clarke stated his decision is not in conflict with the 1872 Mining Act because there is no language in the Mining Act or elsewhere that requires mining to be profitable, and miners are welcome to continue mining with non-motorized equipment.
This decision follows a disturbing trend where judges defer to state and federal agencies regarding what constitutes “reasonable” regulation. And it could very well have a negative impact on the People v. Rinehart case, which is currently under consideration by the California Supreme Court. That case involves federal preemption of state laws and will decide whether or not California can require permits for suction gold dredging—a mining method allowed under federal law—yet refuse to issue such permits.
But before you throw your hands up in disgust and walk away, take a minute to read our “MMAC & PLP Update” in this issue. In that article we lay out the path to getting this situation fixed. We found many sympathetic ears and overwhelming support in Congress during a recent trip to Washington, D.C., and I think your spirits will be lifted again.
• Bill to halt sage grouse management plans introduced
Rob Bishop (R-Utah), Chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, has introduced HR 4339, “The Greater Sage Grouse Protection and Recovery Act of 2016.” The bill would give governors the power to reject parts of the federal sage grouse management plans that call for mineral withdrawals or are otherwise inconsistent with state plans.
Chairman Bishop was joined by fourteen co-sponsors.
In the meantime, the Department of Interior is trying to complete their list of areas to withdraw from mineral entry so the agency can publish those withdrawals in the Federal Register in the next few months.
Back in September 2015, the Department of Interior declared that an Endangered Species listing for sage grouse was not warranted, then followed up with an announcement that millions of acres across the Western states would be considered for mineral withdrawals to set aside habitat.
Six lawsuits have already been filed against the Interior’s sage grouse plans and more are expected. The American Exploration and Mining Association stated they are working with Mountain States Legal Foundation and will add their name to the list of plaintiffs soon.

© ICMJ's Prospecting and Mining Journal, CMJ Inc.
Next Article »« Previous Article
Additional articles that might interest you...
Legislative and Regulatory Update
August 2014
• No Adventure Pass needed
• Supreme Court of Canada rules on aboriginal title claims
• No agreement reached in suction gold dredge permitting case
• No Adventure Pass needed
• Supreme Court of Canada rules on aboriginal title claims
• No agreement reached in suction gold dredge permitting case
Legislative and Regulatory Update
April 2012
• CA Fish & Game Final SEIR
• Positive news from California?
• Still no results in Wisconsin
• Give us back our lands
• CA Fish & Game Final SEIR
• Positive news from California?
• Still no results in Wisconsin
• Give us back our lands
Constitutional Sheriffs Standing Up for Our Rights
December 2012
Modoc County, California, is the latest county to use emergency powers to declare a state of emergency in order to take control of roads and trails away from federal agencies.
Modoc County, California, is the latest county to use emergency powers to declare a state of emergency in order to take control of roads and trails away from federal agencies.
Legislative and Regulatory Update
February 2021
• Resolution Copper project moves closer to fruition in Arizona
MMAC Update
November 2016
Within these districts, some of the roads and trails have been reopened for access, critical habitat designations have been scaled back, and a few Mining Districts were completely removed from proposed withdrawals.
Within these districts, some of the roads and trails have been reopened for access, critical habitat designations have been scaled back, and a few Mining Districts were completely removed from proposed withdrawals.
Legislation and Regulation
September 2023
Amendment to Deny Funding of BLM Land-Grab
Legislative and Regulatory Update
October 2013
• Judge refuses to grant preliminary injuction to end suction gold dredging moratorium in California
• Proposed listing of Yellow-legged frog and Yosemite Toad in northern California
• Judge refuses to grant preliminary injuction to end suction gold dredging moratorium in California
• Proposed listing of Yellow-legged frog and Yosemite Toad in northern California
Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill
• Our Readers Say
• Ask The Experts
• Ask The Experts
• Ask The Experts
• Ask The Experts
• Think You Got It All? Guess Again!
• Nevada's Silver City Gold District -- Part II
• MMAC & PLP Update
• Hard Rock Prospecting With Rusty
• Drywashing in Black Canyon, Arizona
• Progress Continues in Honduras
• Melman on Gold & Silver
• Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices