Magazine

Legislation & Regulation

Legislative and Regulatory Update

January 2016 by Scott Harn

• More roadblocks in southern California

The assault on our public lands continues.

Our federal government continues to throw roadblocks up throughout the Western states to keep miners and other public lands users off public lands.

In Southern California, the West Mojave Route Network Project travel management planning effort covers 9.24 million acres. Federal agencies are working on a supplemental Environmental Impact Statement that will “form the framework for route designation in the West Mojave area.”

The planning area encompasses parts of San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Kern, Inyo and Riverside counties, including many areas that are rich in minerals and metals.

Public comments are due by January 25, 2016, and may be emailed to cawemopa@blm.gov or mailed to:

BLM—CA Desert District

Attn: WMRNP Plan Amendment

22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos

Moreno Valley, CA 92553

Information is available online at www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/fo/cdd/west_mojave__wemo.html

• Greater Sage-grouse withdrawals

BLM has proposed over 10 million acres be withdrawn from mineral entry and other uses in multiple Western states as critical habitat for the Greater Sage-grouse. In fact, these lands have already been segregated for two years while the Secretary of the Interior claims she is collecting public comments before she decides whether or not to withdraw the areas from new mining claims for the next 20 years.

The Fish and Wildlife Service already issued a decision of “not warranted” on the Greater Sage-grouse as a threatened or endangered species, but BLM went ahead with the mineral withdrawal to accomplish the same goal of locking up the lands.

BLM states that valid, existing rights will be honored, but this provides no protection for those miners who are still in the exploration or development stage, nor does it allow for the discovery of additional valuable mineral and metal deposits.

Email comments can be sent to sagebrush_withdrawals@blm.gov or mailed to:

BLM Director

1849 C Street NW (WO-200)

Washington, DC 20240.

The comment deadline is January 15, 2016.

by Scott Harn

Next Article »« Previous Article

Add a Comment

Additional articles that might interest you...

PLP To Address Needs Of Small Miners With Proposed Amendment

March 2018

The Senator’s office was very receptive to the small miner’s plight and was unaware of the dire problems created by the over-regulation of small-scale mining from so many different fronts. It was pointed out that S 145 may help the large mining companies a little, but falls woefully short in addressing the needs of small operators who make up 85% of domestic mines.

Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill • Ask The Experts • Ask The Experts • Ask The Experts • Ask The Experts • Detector Prospecting Accessories • Electrum: Gold and Silver Together • Drywashing Arizona Gold • Mineralized Faults and Contacts in the Search for Gold • Sunshine and Gold • A Successful Trip Through Gold Basin • Oregon Miners File for Summary Judgment • The Significance of Nuggets in Placers • The Strange History of the Utica Mine • Forest Service Seeks to Lock Miners Out in South Dakota • Maitland Bar Nugget to Go On Display • Company Says Central Idaho Project Feasible • Melman on Gold & Silver • Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices

Free:
MMAC & PLP Update

Magazine

Legislation & Regulation

Legislative and Regulatory Update

PLP To Address Needs Of Small Miners With Proposed Amendment

It's the Bottom of the Ninth—And Not Just for California

Legislative and Regulatory Update

Legislative And Regulatory Update

Legislative and Regulatory Update

MMAC & PLP Update -- 2015 Minerals and Mining Regulatory Reform Act

Legislative and Regulatory Update

Advertisements