Legislation & Regulation
Legislative and Regulatory Update
June 2011 by Scott Harn
Democrats on budget committees in both the state Senate and Assembly added language to the budget bill that would place a 5-year moratorium on suction gold dredging unless all impacts of suction dredging are fully mitigated and a new fee structure is in place to fully cover all program costs. The wording would prevent the Department of Fish & Game from spending any funds on dredge regulations and permitting, and would only authorize DFG expenditures related to enforcement and litigation.
It would be impossible to mitigate all aspects of suction dredging—the DFG included items like noise and aesthetics for which there is no mitigation.
If the budget bill passes with this wording included and it is signed by Governor Brown, it would bring the current process of developing revised regulations to a halt.
It may be that Democratic legislators in California have no clue that suction dredgers contribute well over $100 million to the state economy. However, it’s more likely that they don’t care and are beholden to the environmental interests and their money.
We have two suggestions: Contact your legislators and let them politely know how the moratorium on suction dredging is hurting the economy and how it affects your personal spending. In addition, if you are sending a letter to a Republican legislator, ask them to place holds on Democratic bills and initiatives until the suction dredging language is removed from the budget bill.
• Two Oregon Sheriffs challenge Forest Service authority
Grant County Sheriff Glenn Palmer and Josephine County Sheriff Gil Gilbertson both sent letters to the Forest Service expressing their frustrations with how the Service deals with public lands issues, including mining-related issues.
“Regarding the pending cooperative policing agreement between the US Forest Service and the Grant County Sheriff, I am advising you in writing that I will not be signing the agreement. I do not believe that it is in the best interest of the people I serve or the Grant County Sheriff’s Office to continue with the agreement,” said Palmer.
Sheriff Gilberston has had many meetings with the Southwest Oregon Mining Association over the property rights of miners and undue harassment by Forest Service law enforcement officers.
“... it is still the responsibility of this Office to deal with all crimes committed within this geographical jurisdiction. To be clear on my side, I will not abrogate the duties and responsibility of law enforcement within this county,” wrote Gilbertson.
It’s refreshing to learn that these sheriffs are taking the lead in the protection of miner’s rights.
• Gold is money
Legislators in South Carolina have proposed a bill to make gold and silver an alternative currency to the US Dollar in their state.
The House version of the bill states it would “amend the code of laws of South Carolina, 1976, by adding Article 18 to Chapter 1, Title 1 so as to provide that gold or silver coin, or both, shall be legal tender in this State for payment of certain debts; and by adding Article 26 to Chapter 1, Title 1 so as to establish a joint committee for the adoption of an alternate form of currency.”
A similar bill is under consideration by the South Carolina Senate.
South Carolina is following in the footsteps of Utah, which already approved gold and silver as legal tender. Eleven other states are considering similar bills.
© ICMJ's Prospecting and Mining Journal, CMJ Inc.
Additional articles that might interest you...
Feinstein Pushes for Million-Acre Land Grab
November 2015
Met by jeers and cheers from more than 1,000 people, US Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) made another pitch to create three new national monuments in the deserts of southern California recently.
Met by jeers and cheers from more than 1,000 people, US Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) made another pitch to create three new national monuments in the deserts of southern California recently.
CA Supreme Court Rules Against Rinehart - But There Is A Solution
September 2016
Even if the California Supreme Court had ruled in favor of Rinehart, suction dredge miners would be facing the wrath of the State Water Resources Control Board...
Even if the California Supreme Court had ruled in favor of Rinehart, suction dredge miners would be facing the wrath of the State Water Resources Control Board...
Legislative and Regulatory Update
September 2011
• Salazar pushes wilderness
• California Governor signs AB 120
• Salazar pushes wilderness
• California Governor signs AB 120
Uphill Battle Continues for California Dredgers
September 2018
There are currently three controlling agencies or entities over suction dredging in California—and you can make that four if the state legislature decides to further muddy the waters with additional legislation to block suction gold dredging in the state.
Legislative and Regulatory Update
September 2020
• Pendley nomination withdrawn but will remain BLM director for now
• Comments needed for Midas Gold project in Idaho
Legislative and Regulatory Update
May 2011
• Some good news for a change
• New 49ers win Karuk appeal
• Another Oregon bill of concern
• Some good news for a change
• New 49ers win Karuk appeal
• Another Oregon bill of concern
Legislative and Regulatory Update
January 2015
• Some positives in spending bill
• Judge puts brakes on the EPA in Alaska
• Judge to rule in favor of suction gold dredgers
• Some positives in spending bill
• Judge puts brakes on the EPA in Alaska
• Judge to rule in favor of suction gold dredgers
Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill
• Dredge Mining—Current Situation in Idaho
• Fault Zones and Prospects
• What Are Those Rocks In My Pan?
• "Gold Rush: Alaska" in the Porcupine Mining District
• Wyoming's Billion Dollar Nugget—The Trilogy Ends
• Melman on Gold & Silver
• Mining Stock Quotes & Mineral and Metal Prices
Free:
Gold Prospecting and Mining Summit
• Hands-on at Iowa Hill
• Good Research and Bad Luck
