Legislation & Regulation
Legislative and Regulatory Update
November 2014 by Scott Harn
• Big win by a California suction gold dredger
The mandatory settlement hearings for the consolidated suction gold dredging court cases in California were continued until November 14 in San Bernardino County Superior Court.
While the involved parties are not allowed to discuss specifics, there was an outside development with extremely positive implications.
Brandon Rinehart, a miner who was cited in 2012 for suction dredging without a permit, won his appeal in the Third Court of Appeals. Rinehart was not allowed by a lower court to present evidence of federal preemption. The case was remanded back to the lower court for trial. Rinehart will now be allowed to present evidence that the current prohibition on suction dredge mining in California violates federal mining law.
The Third Court of Appeals also agreed to publish their opinion, which means the ruling can be used by miners in the mandatory settlement hearings.
For more on this issue, see “The Dredge Report” in this issue. And be sure to check our online Recent News section for the latest updates.
• Administration locks up another popular gold mining area
On October 10, with the stroke of a pen, President Obama placed another 346,117 acres off-limits in the San Gabriel Mountains outside of Los Angeles by designating the area as a national monument.
National monuments are not open to new mining locations, but valid existing rights must be honored.
Gold mining in the San Gabriel Mountains began in the 1840s. The East Fork of the San Gabriel River has always been popular with weekend prospectors. Now, any type of motorized mining equipment outside of valid existing claims will be prohibited.
This is the thirteenth time President Obama has used the Antiquities Act of 1906 to create or expand a national monument.
• BLM creates de facto wilderness without Congressional approval
The Bureau of Land Management denied a prospecting permit to Mesa Exploration Corp. for a proposed potash mine north of Wendover, Nevada, then denied a second proposal submitted by the company because a historic trail is located nearby.
Potash is primarily used in fertilizers to boost crop yields.
The historic trail, known as Hastings Cutoff, was used by settlers heading West in the 1840s, including some members of the Donner Party, but much of the trail has been obliterated by modern vehicles.
Drilling began on the property back in 1966, and Mesa acquired the project in early 2012.
In its rejection, BLM stated the agency was establishing a protected corridor and was not going to allow any development within 10 miles on either side of the trail, which would create a de facto wilderness of tens of thousands of acres without congressional approval.
“The restriction imposed on this large area by the BLM is unprecedented, unwarranted and, we believe, unlawful,” said Foster Wilson, CEO of Mesa Exploration.
The company has appealed the decision to the Interior Board of Land Appeals.
© ICMJ's Prospecting and Mining Journal, CMJ Inc.
Next Article »« Previous Article
Additional articles that might interest you...
PLP Update
March 2020
We’ve heard from miners in Arizona about federal agencies closing off historic roads that provide access for miners, and we need your input.
Uniting The Small Miners
February 2015
Have you ever wondered what it is going to take to stop the insanity of politicians and environmental groups from taking away our rights?
Have you ever wondered what it is going to take to stop the insanity of politicians and environmental groups from taking away our rights?
Legislative and Regulatory Update
January 2020
- PLF files petition with US Supreme Court on behalf of Oregon miners
- Land and Water Conservation Fund abuse by Forest Service
- Army asks for REE proposals
Legislative and Regulatory Update
December 2017
- Bill to limit Antiquities Act
- PLF seeks relief from Endangered Species Act abuses
MMAC & PLP Update
March 2016
Just prior to our press deadline, we learned that a bill had been introduced in the Idaho House of Representatives to redefine suction gold dredging as a preferred use in public waterways in Idaho.
Update: People v. Rinehart
July 2016
The law is on our side, but we’ve seen some crazy rulings coming out of courtrooms lately. I believe Rinehart will win his case, but then we move on to the State Water Resources Control Board.
The law is on our side, but we’ve seen some crazy rulings coming out of courtrooms lately. I believe Rinehart will win his case, but then we move on to the State Water Resources Control Board.
Clarification on Oregon's SB838
August 2014
The 100-yard restriction in SB838 actually applies to all motorized mining for the purpose of extracting gold, silver or any other precious metal that results in the disturbance of vegetation.
The 100-yard restriction in SB838 actually applies to all motorized mining for the purpose of extracting gold, silver or any other precious metal that results in the disturbance of vegetation.
Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill
• Gemstones to Die For
• The Dredge Report
• Guinea Africa: Gold, Ebola, and A Monkey Barbecue
• Geobotany: Plants Associated With Mineral Deposits
• The Hunt for Remote Canyon Gold
• Why Did This Silver Mine Close? Pt II
• A Golden Summer
• California State and US National Panning Championships
• Melman on Gold & Silver
• Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices