All Articles
Strong Support at Suction Dredge Meetings
December 2009 by Scott Harn
Just prior to press time, we made our way to Sacramento for the second public scoping meeting to comment on the first draft of the California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) suction dredge permitting program for the new Environmental Impact Report.
The meeting room was filled with approximately 250 miners and prospectors. (Those who attended the first scoping meeting in Fresno the previous day stated there were about 80 people in attendance.)
The meeting began with an informal “meet and greet” where attendees could ask questions of staff members prior to the formal meeting.
Michael Stopher, environmental project manager for DFG, opened the meeting by explaining how the current moratorium on suction dredging came about as a result of SB670 and the lawsuit filed in Alameda County by the Karuk Tribe of California.
Michael Stevenson, project leader with Horizon Water & Environment explained the rulemaking process. Horizon is the firm that was hired by the State of California to handle the EIR process and ensure that the process follows the rules set forth in the California Environmental Quality Act. He stated that all questions and concerns gathered by mail, email, and in the public scoping meetings will be compiled in a scoping report, and each question or concern will be answered by a staff member. The next step will be a draft EIR, which will come in the summer or fall of 2010, followed by another opportunity for public input, including public hearings where concerned miners will be allowed to comment on the record. A final EIR is not expected until spring 2011, which will be followed by a Notice of Determination and CEQA findings.
When the actual meeting began, DFG controlled the format and frustrated miners by not allowing us the opportunity to speak in a standard question and answer format. Much to the dismay of those in attendance, we were asked to fill out cards with questions for the staff to review and answer. No follow up questions were allowed.
Stopher answered many of the written questions himself, with assistance from the staff of Horizon when needed.
At least one serious question was answered during this period: A Horizon staff member declared that methylmercury is not a concern for suction dredging regulations. He explained that mercury does not become methylmercury after it is passed through a dredge.
Stopher refused to answer several important concerns. He stated he could not answer questions regarding the federal lawsuit filed by Public Lands for the People that would enjoin the State of California from enforcing SB670. He also refused to define the term “deleterious” as it applies to the effects of suction dredging. Stopher stated these items were currently being litigated so he was not allowed to discuss them.
Stopher said that some suction dredge miners who held permits in the past year will be receiving surveys. The surveys will ask for detailed information regarding spending activity and the amount of gold found so the agency can determine the economic impact of suction dredging in California.
It is extremely important for those who receive surveys to list all related spending and account for every speck of gold found so the State can get a true picture of what miners contribute to the economy of California. Although this information is not required by CEQA, it is considered as a factor later in the rulemaking process.
Miners will not have to wait until 2011 for the EIR to be completed before they get back in the water if the federal lawsuit filed by PLP is settled in favor of the miners before then.
Be sure to check the “Recent News” section of our website for more updates.
Junior Miners and Investors Gather in Canada
Two landmark golden gatherings took place in Vancouver, British Columbia near the end of January, and while they both related to the world of gold, they each had a completely different emphasis.
The Bawl Mill
• Are you paying for others' risk-taking?...
• They call it the "impalement captial of the United States"—and not to be funny!...
Old Dog(Fighter), New Trick
Then it occurred to me that the drywasher was designed by an engineer. Gotta love engineers! Those slide-rule geeks always tinker with gravity, angles, curves and flow.
Legislative and Regulatory Update
• Utah, fed up with federal and environmental policies, takes action
• Administration proposes ending fish protections to settle suit
• Court finds fault with Forest Service spotted owl study
The Carter and Reynolds Gold Mines: Is There a Yet Unknown, but Mineable Gold Deposit Here?
The Carter and Reynolds gold mines were two of the earliest gold deposits to be exploited following the first discovery of gold in North Carolina in 1799, at the Reed gold mine. Both of these mines were worked to a limited degree between 1800 and 1900. The Carter mine is located approximately 3.0 miles east of Troy, North Carolina...
Detecting Old Ground Sluice Locations
Ground sluicing, surfacing and scratching are a few names given to the recovery of gold in shallow areas. Where I live, the hills are dotted with small surface diggings.
Drywashing and Detecting for Eluvial Placer Gold Research is the Key to Success—Part I
How many of you remember hearing or reading the phrase, “only a small percentage of the earth’s recoverable gold has been found?” This more aptly applies to large mining corporations having the means to develop and run large...
Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill
• Legislative and Regulatory Update
• Small-Scale Mining, Milling and Recovery
• Judge Rules Against Oregon Miner
• Shirttail Creek
• A Modern Gold Rush In Sudan
• Double-D Coils and Their Place in the Goldfields
• Melman on Gold & Silver
Free:
Golden Hope's Bellechasse Gold Project
• Where to Prospect for Gold in Colorado
