All Articles
Legislative and Regulatory Update
May 2007 by Scott Harn
• Endangered Species Act update
New draft regulations appear to be in the works for the Endangered Species Act.
A draft document that was being worked on by the US Fish and Wildlife Service was leaked to several environmental groups, obviously by someone within the agency who has environmental leanings. The draft calls for greater influence by individual states, a recovery area limited to the current range of the species instead of the current historic range, and limiting the “foreseeable future” that a species may be at risk to 20 years from the 50-to-100 year span now.
The agency is calling it a discussion document at this stage.
An effort is still underway in Congress to revise the Endangered Species Act through legislation. Five Republican senators introduced Senate Bill 658. The bill would prevent the Fish and Wildlife Service from listing a species as threatened or endangered until after a recovery plan is written.
The last time a similar bill was issued Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-Arkansas) was listed as a cosponsor. He is not a cosponsor this time around. We do not believe this bill will make it out of the Senate now that Democrats are in control of the majority.
• California Fish & Game tries yet another route to stop gold dredgers
California Assemblywoman Lois Wolk (D-Davis) has introduced AB 1032, a bill that would block suction dredge mining in many state waterways. It would also take permit authority out of the hands of the Department of Fish and Game and place it under control of the Fish and Game Commission.
Fish and Game has been looking for a way to block suction dredge mining in the state following their recent defeat in court in the Karuk Tribe case. (See “Karuk Tribe case over, for now,” pg. 3, February 2007 issue of ICMJ’s Prospecting and Mining Journal).
The bill proposes to allow the Fish and Game Commission to close waters to dredging if “Heritage Trout” or other species deemed threatened are present. Dredgers would have to obtain a permit from the commission if they wish to dredge these waters.
The bill “would prohibit the commission from approving a permit unless it finds that the subject dredging operation will not be deleterious to certain species. The bill would authorize the department to close an area to dredging otherwise opened for dredging and for which a permit has been issued, without regard to water level, if the department determines that it is necessary to protect fish and wildlife resources, including wild trout stocks within designated heritage trout waters, and native aquatic or amphibian species listed by the commission as endangered or threatened under the California Endangered Species Act, or species identified by the department as species of special concern.”
In addition, the bill looks to create a two-tiered fee system. An extra $105 would be charged to a dredger who is a state resident, or $110 to an out-of-state dredger, “when the department deems that an onsite investigation is necessary.”
The bill ignores the fact that mining is a right, not a privilege, and that regulating the dredger out of the water amounts to a takings issue. Public Lands for the People (PLP), along with their attorney, are heading to Sacramento in an attempt to educate state lawmakers regarding this fact.
If AB 1032 passes, a lawsuit will be necessary to correct the situation and restore the rights of dredgers. Please see page 43 for information on how you can support PLP’s efforts on the behalf of miners.
Ask the Experts
Q: Can you please tell me about diamond fluorescense?
The Underground Mining Adventure Continues
Our group of independent miners have been busy crafting a uniquely designed ladder/ore cart track from the bottom of an 85-foot mine shaft in a historical hard rock mine.
Wealth Beyond Your Wildest Imagination
“Wealth beyond your wildest imagination.” Those were the words that were used to inform me of how much gold was in a paleo channel that exists beneath the present channel of the Similkameen River in the State of Washington; words that have echoed in my mind for the past sixteen years.
The Bawl Mill
• Taxed to the max...
• What were they thinking?
• Maybe they just misplaced it...
• Not so environmentally friendly after all...
Mining the Old-Timers
“They’re taking it to the grave with them.” These words came from my Canadian mining partner when we discussed what he had learned from an elderly gentleman in a nursing home. While that particular visit was not very successful, we had a number of others that worked out far better.
Melman on Gold & Silver
What gives this illustration great importance is America may be facing the same kind of dilemmas that have brought Japan’s market such long-term grief.
Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill
• Ask the Experts—Where can I find plans for a home-built suction dredge?
• Ask The Experts—Can you help explain the ratings in Melman On Gold & Silver?
• Recovering Values from Black Sands
• Typhoon Exploration—Junior Mining Company Moves Forward in Quebec
• Kalgoorlie, Australia—Born of Gold
• Colorado Court Rules on Cyanide Ban
• Selling Your Gold—Where To Start
• The Business of Mines—Consider Your Tax Deductions Now
• Exploration, Development and Taxes
• US v. Donald Eno—IBLA Rules in Favor of Miner
• Miners Clean Washington Rivers and Streams
• Melman on Gold & Silver
• Mining Stock Quotes, Mineral & Metal Prices
• Looking Back
Free:
