Let us help you recover valuable metals. 888-437-1187

Magazine

Legislation & Regulation

Legislative and Regulatory Update

• Idaho continues toward elimination of EPA suction dredging regulations
On March 13, the Idaho House State Affairs Committee held another hearing on whether or not to eliminate Environmental Protection Agency authority in the state.

Following the hearing, which included the testimony of numerous suction gold dredge miners, no opposing testimony and 76 supporters who signed their names in support, the committee passed House Bill 473.

The bill declares EPA authority would be “null and void and of no force and effect in this state.”

The bill now heads to the full Idaho House of Representatives for debate and a possible vote.


• EPA makes preemptive strike against Alaska mine
The EPA announced they have initiated a Clean Water Act review process in an attempt to prevent the Pebble Limited Partnership from developing the Pebble Project, a mining project valued in the billions of dollars in southern Alaska.

The EPA is taking this step even though no Plan of Operations has been submitted.


• Proposed Mines Act permit fees
The British Columbia (Canada) Ministry of Energy and Mines is proposing charging Mines Act permit fees for all mines in the province.

The proposed fees are as follows:

$2,000 for small-scale placer and mineral/coal exploration disturbing less than 1 hectare

$4,000 for medium-scale placer and mineral/coal exploration disturbing less than 3 hectares

$6,000 for large-scale placer and mineral/coal exploration disturbing 3 hectares or more

$4,000 for sand and gravel operations

$5,000 for custom mills

$6,000 for rock and industrial mineral quarries

$40,000 for all operations requiring a review under Section 9 of the Mines Act

$300,000 for large-scale major mines, expansions, and permit amendments

$100,000 for major mines, expansions and permit amendments

$10,000 for minor permit amendments to major mines

Unfortunately, the notice from the British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines states that comments would only be accepted through March 31, 2014—leaving little or no time to notify ICMJ readers. However, we posted this information to our website at www.icmj.com on March 16 in an effort to notify those miners who might wish to send in comments.
© ICMJ's Prospecting and Mining Journal, CMJ Inc.
Next Article »« Previous Article

Add a Comment

Additional articles that might interest you...

MMAC & PLP Update


We have been playing defense for 100% of the game, and now we are finally playing some offense.

Lawsuit Update From the New 49'ers


Many of you are aware that we have been engaged in litigation with anti-mining activists that have been attacking us through the Karuk Tribe of California since 2003. It all started with their lawsuit against the US Forest Service (USFS), challenging that District Rangers do not have the authority to allow small-scale mining activities under a Notice of Intent (NOI) when the Ranger concludes that the mining activity is not likely to create a substantial surface disturbance.

PLP and MMAC Update


We have an opportunity to make significant and substantial changes to provide relief for small miners with the Trump Administration and the current makeup of Congress. We realize the time to act is now, but we need your help.

Selenium, Mercury and Suction Dredging—Studies Contradict CA State Water Resources Board


Federal and state regulatory agencies often cite mercury and methyl mercury in our waterways as a major factor for further restrictions on placer mining, and on suction gold dredge mining, in particular. However, these regulatory agencies are minimizing selenium and its neutralizing effects.

Addressing EPA Overreach: What Dredgers Need to Know


The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been attempting to extend their authority and intimidate miners and other public land users for decades. Suction gold dredgers are no exception, and we want to highlight a recent example of how to deal with this federal overreach.

Legislative and Regulatory Update


PLF scores another win for property rights

Record $11 Million Fine for California Mine


State regulators imposed a record $11 million fine on the operators of a gold mine in the Sierra foothills east of Sacramento.

Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill   • Ask the Experts   • Ask the Experts   • Ask the Experts   • Ask the Experts   • Ask the Experts   • Ask the Experts   • Mining for Gold and Sapphires in Montana   • Contrary to Rumors, Couple Will Keep the Saddle Ridge Hoard   • Finding Gold with a VLF Detector—Part I   • Creating Your Own Luck   • Over the Divide—Robert Michael “Mike” Corbley   • Continuing Hard Rock Exploration   • Recovering Fine Gold with Oleophilic Adhesion   • Detecting for Gold in Nevada   • Using Structural Clues to Locate Buried Placer Channels   • Gold Deposits of the Ivory Coast   • Melman on Gold & Silver   • Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices

Free:

Advertisements

Garrett Electronics - trusted by real miners & prospectors!
Precious Metals Recovery plants and equipment
Fighting to keep public lands open to the public
Specializing in the processing of precious metal ores!
Watch prospecting shows on your computer right now
Free Online Sample Issue