Garrett Electronics - trusted by real miners & prospectors!

Magazine

Legislation & Regulation

Legislative and Regulatory Update

PLF files petition with US Supreme Court on behalf of Oregon miners
As we reported last month, the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) agreed to assist mining attorney James Buchal and miners in Oregon with a petition to the US Supreme Court regarding the “no addition” argument for suction dredging.

The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality claimed suction gold dredgers are required to obtain a Section 402 EPA permit as a polluter, but the Clean Water Act clearly states there must be the addition of a pollutant to trigger the need for such a permit.

In Eastern Oregon Mining Association v. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, the Oregon Supreme court (in a 6-1 decision) ruled that the mere movement of material already within a navigable waterway was deemed to be an addition. The US Supreme Court petition from PLF seeks to fix this error. It has now been completed and submitted to the US Supreme Court for consideration.

A few select quotes from the US Supreme Court petition:

...For today’s suction dredge miners the principal threat comes from heavy-handed government.
...The Court should resolve the conflict between...courts...that have adopted the “mere movement” rule...holding that the mere movement of pre-existing pollutants within a regulated water does not trigger the Clean Water Act’s permitting requirement.”
...This Court should reinforce the textual boundaries of the Clean Water Act to arrest the Act’s continued deformation into an overbearing federal land-use statute.

The arguments are well-written, clear and concise, and backed by significant case precedence. This seems to be the strongest US Supreme Court petition we’ve seen to date to get the clarification necessary and get suction gold dredgers back to work.

Land and Water Conservation Fund abuse by Forest Service
A review by the Government Accountability Office found the US Forest Service ignored federal restrictions to acquire many thousands of acres of new federal lands.

The federal Land and Water Conservation fund includes provisions that limit the amount of land the Forest Service can acquire in Western States to “not more than 15 percent” of purchases. However, the GAO report found the Forest Service added 124,000 acres—with 76% of those lands out 
west—from 2014 through 2018.

Though Senator Lisa Murkowski, chair of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, called for greater oversight to avoid this problem in the future, she failed to call upon the agency to dispose of lands that were above the legal threshold.

Army asks for REE proposals
The US Army announced plans to  fund the construction of rare earth processing facilities. It’s the first time taxpayer funds will be used for the production of rare earths since the Manhattan Project, which was undertaken to create the first atomic bomb during WWII.

The stated goal is to reduce the reliance on China for rare earth minerals essential for advanced weapons and technology.

The Army announcement asked for proposals for a pilot plant and agreed to cover up to two-thirds of the cost of a new processing facility.

© ICMJ's Prospecting and Mining Journal, CMJ Inc.
Next Article »« Previous Article

Add a Comment

Additional articles that might interest you...

Study Confirms Mercury Levels Safe in California's Gold Country


While the Water Board documented the selenium levels in fish and noted they exceed the levels of mercury, they have yet to acknowledge the numerous scientific studies that show selenium effectively neutralizes the effects of mercury.

Legislative and Regulatory Update


• Governors push back on Biden’s public lands acquisition plan

Legislative and Regulatory Update


• Backdoor Wild Lands order
• PLP reports on latest dredge lawsuit
• Massive lands bill avoided
• No cap and trade for now
• RS-2477 rights affirmed

Modern-Day Claim Jumping


We soon found that our discovery post and other claim markers were gone and replaced with new posts and a notice of location with an earlier date than had been on our notice of location.

Miners Win in Montana Water Court


I hope this case inspires some of you. It shows that miners can and do succeed when they are persistent and well-prepared, even when representing themselves against state and federal attorneys in a court of law.

MSHA Moves Ahead on Silica RFI But Leaves All Options Open


For now, MSHA is just collecting information. However, the information it collects will shape what comes next.

MMAC & PLP Update


The legislators soon came to the realization that Mining Districts and our proposed bill can solve many of the problems they currently face in their home states.

Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill   • Ask The Experts - How do I separate gold from broken glass?   • Ask The Experts - Can I get some tips on filing a mining claim?   • Ask The Experts - Metal detector discrimination can be beneficial   • Ask The Experts - Can I crush ore on my BLM claim and still be a small miner?   • Gold In The Midwest—Part II: Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio   • 21st Century American Gold Rush: Rare Earth Elements   • Exceptions to the Rules: Re-Thinking Prospecting Rules of Thumb   • Prospecting The East Fork San Gabriel Canyon, Southern California   • Hit the Slopes to Find More Gold   • Sixteen to One Gold Mine: Unique Challenges and Potential Rewards - Pt I   • What About Palladium?   • Melman on Gold & Silver   • Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices

Free:
PLP Update: A Huge Win for Miners

Advertisements

Precious Metals Recovery plants and equipment
Fighting to keep public lands open to the public
Specializing in the processing of precious metal ores!
Watch prospecting shows on your computer right now
Free Online Sample Issue