Garrett Electronics - trusted by real miners & prospectors!

Magazine

Legislation & Regulation

Legislative and Regulatory Update

California dredging update
On May 1, 2015, Judge Gilbert Ochoa finally signed an order following his January ruling that state law cannot preempt federal law. In other words, federal law allows reasonable regulation of mining, but the State of California cannot prohibit suction gold dredge mining by requiring a permit and then refuse to issue such a permit.
 
Some of our readers have gone back to suction gold dredging. Some have also said they carry a copy of Judge Ochoa’s January decision so they can present it to any law enforcement officer who might try to issue them a citation for dredging without a permit. Most have said this has worked—once the law enforcement officer is politely educated, he or she has left the miner alone.

A few suction dredge miners have been cited and I’m aware of one who had his equipment confiscated as well. (These miners did not have a copy of the court decision with them, so I do not know if it would have made a difference.)
 
Judge Ochoa has been made aware that he needs to do more. He needs to put something in writing to give suction gold dredge miners relief and attorneys representing the miners are continuing to meet with the judge to work through this process.
 
In the meantime, I suggest all suction gold dredgers take a look at the article on page 39 titled, “Direct and Constructive Notice.” This process can be followed by dredgers throughout the West to ensure regulators follow the law and it is the first step in suing a government employee personally for violating your rights.
 
Meanwhile, up in Siskiyou County, New 49’ers attorney James Buchal filed for a restraining order to prevent law enforcement in that county from  issuing citations and/or confiscating equipment. The State of California immediately filed papers to get the restraining order case moved to San Bernardino to Judge Ochoa’s courtroom. Judge Ochoa has granted the State’s request.
 
Buchal has met with Judge Ochoa and they continue to try to work through the question of relief for the miners.
“...I believe that, thanks to the pressure of the New 49’ers and their members, we have finally convinced the Judge that he needs to address the question of relief, and that we have a reasonable chance of getting him to act on his ‘temptation’ and grant us the relief,” said Buchal.
 
Favorable bills in Congress
HR 1732, the Regulatory Integrity Protection Act of 2015, would require the Army Corps of Engineers and the EPA to withdraw their current proposal to expand their jurisdiction to non-navigable waters.
 
S 1140, the Federal Water Quality Protection Act, is a similar bill in the Senate that would require the Corps and EPA to exclude isolated ponds, ditches, agriculture water, storm water, groundwater, and similar waters from their definition of “Waters of the United States.”
 
A Senate budget amendment included language to delay the EPA from implementing a new definition of navigable waters. The amendment passed (59-40). And the House released their appropriations bill,which prohibits funding for the EPA to write or issue a new definition of waters, and prohibits the Corps from changing the definition of “fill material” and “discharge of fill material.”
© ICMJ's Prospecting and Mining Journal, CMJ Inc.
Next Article »« Previous Article

Add a Comment

Additional articles that might interest you...

AMRA Takes On USFS in Idaho


Mr. Hughes was obviously shaken by our interaction and we are quite confident he assumed we were all missing teeth, long-haired, uneducated, backwoods miners who would immediately become submissive. That didn’t happen...

Today's MSHA


We all know that it was never Congress’ intent to regulate gold panners and other individual mine operators through MSHA. In fact, I believe the concept of owner-operated mines with no employees was so strange a concept to the lawmakers that they never even thought there would be a need for such an exemption.

Selecting A Low-Risk Region To Explore, Mine or Invest


“The evidence is clear—mineral deposits alone are not enough to attract precious commodity investment dollars...”

Legislative and Regulatory Update


• ESA changes for the better

CA Supreme Court Rules Against Rinehart - But There Is A Solution


Even if the California Supreme Court had ruled in favor of Rinehart, suction dredge miners would be facing the wrath of the State Water Resources Control Board...

State Lends Help to County in Nevada Road Fight


Nevada’s attorney general for the first time is joining a rural county in a 15-year-old legal battle...

Legislative and Regulatory Update


• Hearing date moved up for preliminary injunction for California suction dredging
• Anti-mining bills in Oregon lead to recall effort

Subscription Required:
The Bawl Mill   • Ask The Experts   • Ask The Experts   • Ask The Experts   • Ask The Experts   • Ask The Experts   • Companion Gold   • The Smell of Gold—Part I   • A Few Tips and Tricks for Beach Mining   • The Basics of Froth Flotation   • Direct and Constructive Notice   • Moore Creek, Alaska—Then and Now   • Nome Offshore Dredging Creates Challenges   • Mining Journal Wins Again!   • The Montanore Copper and Silver Project   • Family Wins Back Seized Gold Coins   • Melman on Gold & Silver   • Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices

Free:
Update on MMAC & PLP

Advertisements

Precious Metals Recovery plants and equipment
Fighting to keep public lands open to the public
Specializing in the processing of precious metal ores!
Watch prospecting shows on your computer right now
Free Online Sample Issue