Legislative and Regulatory Update
July 2012 by Scott Harn• Forest Service proposes next step in Agenda 21
The Forest Service has proposed using categorical exclusions to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to remove “water control structures, such as dikes, ditches culverts and pipes, restore lands and habitat to predisturbance conditions to the extent practicable by removing debris, sediment, and hazardous conditions following natural or human-caused events; and restore lands occupied by roads and trails to natural conditions. The proposed road and trail restoration category would be used for restoring lands impacted by non-system roads and trails that are no longer needed and no longer maintained.”
The federal government will undoubtedly use this tool to further restrict access to public lands by mining claim holders and other public land users. Through the use of Travel Management Plans, the Forest Service has already been systematically locking off roads and trails throughout the West, including some that have been in use for decades.
With this latest proposal, the Forest Service is taking the next step towards implementing the plans set forth in Agenda 21 and the Wildlands Project. These two initiatives are largely responsible for the extremely restrictive regulations put forth by the federal government over the past two decades.
It all starts with “sustainable development.” The term “sustainable development” was first introduced in 1987 by The Brundtland Commission on Environment and Development, headed by Gro Harlem Brundtland, Vice President of the World Socialist Party. “Sustainable development” is a fancy term that means followers will preserve the environment while limiting economic growth to human needs, with priority given to the world’s poor—those who already have their essential needs met, i.e. citizens in the United States and other developed countries, will bear the cost.
Agenda 21 was born in 1992, at the United Nations Earth Summit in Rio De Janeiro. That’s where 178 world leaders signed on to support the vague idea of “sustainable development.” Soon after, the Forest Service changed their focus from multiple use to sustainability—they have a website dedicated to this goal at: www.na.fs.fed.us/sustainability
Presidents Clinton, George H. W. Bush, and Obama have all signed executive orders implementing portions of Agenda 21, though it has never been approved by Congress. President Bush signed the Rio Accord, and President Clinton subsequently established the President’s Council for Sustainable Development (Executive Order #12858) which required guidelines for Agenda 21 to be established and administered by the federal government across all departments.
The United Nations created the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) to implement their plans with the help of non-governmental environmental organizations, state, local and federal governments. There are literally hundreds of non-governmental organizations involved now, including The Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, National Wildlife Federation, Environmental Defense Fund, National Education Society, and Planned Parenthood, to name a few. By attaching grant money and other funds to desired projects and outcomes, our federal government has been able to circumvent Congressional approval and keep much of the public in the dark.
Some of the less publicized goals of Agenda 21 include redistribution of wealth and population control. Full information on Agenda 21 and the Wildlands Project are easily available with a simple Internet search.
The Forest Service proposal on categorical exclusions was published in the Federal Register on June 13. Comments are being accepted until August 13. We highly recommend sending a copy of your comments to your state and federal legislators.
Comments can be faxed to (801)397-1605 or submitted online at: www.regulations.gov attention “Categorical Exclusions.”
• 9th Circuit Court deals blow to small miners
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Forest Service must consult with other agencies prior to approving a Notice of Intent for suction dredging.
The case was an appeal filed by the Karuk Tribe and environmentalists following the approval of a Notice of Intent for suction dredging in northern California back in 2004 for The New 49ers mining club.
From attorney James Buchal, who represented The New 49ers:
“I am sorry to say that the Ninth Circuit has, by a vote of 7-4, determined that Forest Service review of a miner’s Notice of Intent triggers a duty to engage in Endangered Species Act consultations. The earlier panel opinion to the contrary was overturned. This en banc opinion ignores many of the relevant arguments we presented, misrepresents the facts and law, and even goes so far as to omit us from the list of counsel participating.
“The decision triggered a remarkable, forceful and even illustrated dissent, suggesting that citizens have entered into a particular hell (‘Abandon all hope, ye who enter here’) wrought by the majority’s abandonment of the rule of law in this and other environmental cases.
“I hope that The New 49’ers will find support from the mining community to seek Supreme Court review of this shabby decision.”
A copy of the decision is available at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2012/06/01/05-16801.pdf
• New California suction gold dredging regulations released—and they are just as bad as we predicted
• Dredgers file US Supreme Court response in Oregon case
• Washington State pushes same suction gold dredging narrative
• Pentagon reverses decision on rare earth projects
This ruling comes at an opportune time, just as suction dredge miners are dealing with new proposed regulations in several western states. Be sure to cite this case when you provide comments on the regulations!
- Bernhardt confirmed
- State of Montana to appeal Rock Creek decision
• Some good news for a change
• New 49ers win Karuk appeal
• Another Oregon bill of concern
There are currently three controlling agencies or entities over suction dredging in California—and you can make that four if the state legislature decides to further muddy the waters with additional legislation to block suction gold dredging in the state.
• Battle continues in Oregon
• Stop annexation in Southern California
• EPA ignores Supreme Court ruling with new Idaho permit
• Alaska sues Feds to restore access rights
• California dredgers await next big court date
We spent the morning in a meeting with one of the higher-ups at the US Forest Service. I presented him with 412 complaints received from our readers, along with a summary of the complaints to make his job easier.
The Bawl Mill • Gold Depositiion and Gradients of Placer Streams—Part II • The Life of an Independent Prospector • Gold in Guyana—Part I: Porknocking on the Puruni River Road • That Something Extra • Prospecting for Copper Ores—Part II • Metallic Trash—Scourge of the Prospector • Gold Mining Boom in the Carolinas • California Suction Dredging Update • Mine, Baby, Mine! • Hecla to Reopen Lucky Friday Mine • Nova Scotia Shows It's Serious About Jobs & Mining • Melman on Gold & Silver • Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices