Legislative and Regulatory Update
October 2021 by Scott Harn
• BLM is moving back to DC?
Dept. of Interior Secretary Deb Haaland announced the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will reverse a Trump Administration decision that moved BLM’s headquarters closer to the region it served, from Washington, DC, to Colorado.
The Trump move included relocating 222 positions to various Western States, with 27 supervisors and support staff heading to the new headquarters in Golden, Colorado. The estimated cost savings was substantial—$50 million to $100 million over 20 years—because of the substantially lower cost of living compared to DC and less money spent on travel.
The move also served to inject new blood into the agency as many employees decided to resign or retire rather than relocate.
Haaland stated the agency will establish a headquarters in both states under President Biden, so much of that cost savings will likely be eliminated or the cost may even increase.
William Perry Pendley, who was the acting director of BLM during the Trump Administration and tasked with implementing the move, applauded the decision at the time.
“The decsion-makers are in Washington, that’s where it’s centralized. And I’m afraid they’re out of touch with what’s going on out on the land,” Pendley said back in 2019.
In a recent exclusive with the Prospecting and Mining Journal, Pendley told us that “only a handful of the 41 positions we established in Grand Junction are headed back to DC to join the 61 positions we left there to handle public affairs, congressional affairs, regulatory affairs, budget, and FOIA issues. ...The hundreds of positions we moved to locations consistent with their duties will remain in the West.”
“For example, we put the wild horse managers in Nevada where 70 percent of the wild horses are located. We put the archeological experts in Santa Fe closer to the work they do primarily around the Four Corners. And we put the renewable energy experts in California, which is the epicenter of that work.
“In short, Haaland’s decision vindicates the wisdom of our work to put the top leaders near the resources they manage and the people who report to them. Frankly, people who do the work the BLM does do not want to be in DC. They want to be close to the resources they manage whether that is recreation, energy, timber or cultural. Plus, they want to enjoy the lower cost of living, higher standard of living, and shorter daily commutes to work (10 minutes vs. 1.5 hours one way).”
• Gray wolf re-listed?
The US Fish and Wildlife service announced on September 15 that the gray wolf could get re-listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) due to the risk of “potential increases in human-caused mortality.”
This announcement coincided with opening day of wolf hunting season in Montana and Idaho, two states where wolves have been responsible for the killing of cattle, sheep, llamas and livestock guardian dogs.
• EPA to redefine WOTUS again
The Environmental Protection Agency announced the agency intends to do redefine Waters of the United States (WOTUS) yet again after seasonal streams, ditches and ponds were removed from federal EPA jurisdiction by the Trump Administration.
Miners and other public land users can expect that further restrictions will be put in place by the Biden Administration.
You can find information online in the Federal Register by searching for “FR Doc. 2021-16643.”
- Some mining claim fees increase
- Oregon miners file appeal
- US Fish & Wildlife law enforcement policing powers restrained
All of which brings us back to the question of why we rely so heavily on China in the first place. America’s economy is heavily dependent upon energy and telecommunications, but does that require Chinese manufacturing? Clearly not.
• It's almost November
• Two federal land managers found guilty of contempt
• A chance to halt additional wilderness in Southern California
• Oregon mineral withdrawal
• A really good reason to get out and vote in Oregon
The approval, which affects 87 acres on the south end of Silver City, allows the company to move forward with exploration to determine the area's mining potential.
• Show of support needed for anti-EPA bills
• Arizona mining data now online
• California suction dredge hearings
• Update on Forest Service abuse in Washington
I found I could not go prospecting in areas where I did not have a mining claim and the Forest Service thought my mere presence was a danger to the forest.
• Comment deadlines approaching for frog listings and habitat
• EPA seeks more control
• Comments due in Washington
• California dredging moratorium
• PLF sues to delist polar bear
The Bawl Mill • Ask The Experts - Is the trumpet plant a good indicator of minerals? • Ask The Experts - Why won’t my detector respond on wire gold? • Ask The Experts - Should I be able to locate gold near old volcanoes? • Secrets of Gold Research and Why You Need It • Detecting 'New Again' Spots • The Miner’s Theme Park: MINExpo 2021 • Downieville: Another Gold Rush Favorite • Placer Sampling for the Small-Scale Miner • Gold Prospecting for Better or Worse: The Disappearing Nuggets • National Mining Hall of Fame Names 2021 Inductees • Lithium Fuels Hopes Around Salton Sea • Melman on Gold & Silver • Mining Stock Quotes and Mineral & Metal Prices